"Design Tips From Your
Machinist"
or "How To Save Money In The
Engineering
Department"
© 2003 by David M. Butcher, B Machine
Products, Parkersburg, WV
I have been machining parts for industrial and commercial customers
over the past 28 years. During that time, I have run into several
situations where properly engineered drawings could have saved the
customer money. Most of these could have been avoided. Let
me tell you about a few situations that we have encountered.
Firstly, it's amazing how many engineered drawings we receive where
stock material sizes were apparently given little or no
consideration. In other words, the engineer specifies a material
sized according
to minimal needs rather than checking to see what sizes are normal
stock. The machinist then has to cut the material to the size
specified, resulting in higher part costs.
In another scenario, the nominal size is the same as a stock size, but
close tolerance specifications require the machinist to
buy a larger size and cut it down to meet a tolerance that is tighter
than commercial standards. Often, these tighter tolerances are
simply the result of an engineer using more decimal points than
necessary for that dimension. He didn't take time to change his
computer's decimal point. The smart machinist will call the
customer, or
engineering department, to ensure that the tolerance is necessary, but
some will simply buy the larger size and cut it down. Tip: Every
design engineer and draftsman could benefit from having a material
stock
list, with commercial tolerances, available to him/her. Most
metal
service centers, such as EMJ or Castle Metals, publish such lists.
One job we did specified .001" tolerance on all dimensions.
Knowing how the parts were used, I knew this was not a necessary
tolerance. Do you realize the cost difference between +/-.010"
and +/-.002"
tolerances? According to the "Machining Data Handbook" published
by Metcut Research Associates, Inc., it takes four times as long to
meet the smaller tolerance in most instances. Time is
money. Of course, that time difference may depend on the part,
quantity being
made, and the machinery it's being manufactured on. CNC equipment
[Computer Numerical Control] can often make this discussion a mute
point as it is a lot easier to hold tighter tolerances using a
computer.
Even with computers, too tight a tolerance is still a concern that can
cost your company money. Tip: Always use the loosest practical
tolerances in your designs.
In our shop we use the following tolerances as standard for inch
dimensions:
.x or fractional +/-.015"
.xx
+/-.010"
.xxx
+/-.005"
These tolerances are reasonably easy to maintain in most
situations. Still, the tighter the tolerance the more it will
cost to ensure that the tolerance is met. Four decimal tolerances
are often necessary for things like bearing fits, so don't be afraid
to use such a tolerance if it's actually needed. Tip: Just be
aware that it costs more to meet those tighter tolerances.
Engineers, or draftsmen, who use more than four decimals on inch
dimensions [more than three on metrics] sometimes seem to be using
whatever numbers their calculator comes up with. We have to guess
what they really need, or contact them to find out. Tip:
Use
only the number of decimal points required for the necessary tolerance.
We sometimes receive drawings that specify a hardness different from
commercial standards. A good example is a shaft we once made that
required AISI 4140 steel material with a hardness of 34-38Rc [Rockwell
"C" hardness scale]. This material is commercially available in a
pre-hardened condition with a hardness of 28-32Rc at very low
cost. The shaft was designed to hold a spare wheel on a
truck. Was the hardness specified necessary, or simply a whim of
the designer? I still don't know, but we had to add the extra
cost, and lead time, to heat treat these parts. Tip: Know
what materials are commercially available and use these when possible.
The shaft mentioned above brings to mind another situation. The
designer specified a thread that was 1-1/16" in diameter with 16
threads per inch. How special is that? That meant that we
had to have "special" go-nogo gages made to check the thread that cost
7-8 times the cost of standard gages. Standard thread size would
have resulted in less cost for both the shaft and the nut. A
smart engineer will have a thread chart handy and use industry
standards wherever possible. Yes, there are specs in the
Machinist's Handbook for
those other threads, but the main question is: "Are these threads in
standard use in the industry?" Tip: Check a tooling catalog, such
as McMaster-Carr or MSC Industrial Supply, to see if tooling is readily
available for the thread under consideration.
Thread charts are useful, and are often used by designers and
machinists. The best thread charts will have two or three columns
regarding tap
drill sizes. These columns are expressed as "percentage of
thread"
and usually indicate 75%, 70%, and 60% threads. Testing in
laboratories has shown that there is no significant strength increase
when an internal thread form is more than 60% of its theoretical
height. Tip:
For those difficult to machine materials, specify a tap drill
from the 60% column. It will result in fewer broken taps and
ruined parts. 70-75% is best for free machining or low strength
materials. That reduces the possibility of oversize holes
creating a less than desired thread form.
Following these tips may help your machinist make better
parts and keep your costs down. Your boss may also appreciate
it. Look at all the money you will save the company . . . and
he can take credit for it!